Monday, May 20, 2013

Palestinian Asylum Seeker Bides Time by Raping British Women


A Palestinian man has been convicted of raping a woman in Glasgow city centre and assaulting another months earlier.
Failed asylum seeker Mohammed Al Dehshari, 28, raped the 30-year-old, who had been working as a prostitute, in Washington Street in October 2012.
He was caught after his DNA was found on the victim and later connected to an attack on another prostitute at a flat in Sighthill 18 months earlier.
Sentence on Dehshari was deferred and he was remanded in custody.
The High Court in Glasgow heard how a smiling Dehshari approached the rape victim on 10 October last year and guided her to a "lonely spot" in Washington Street.
'Going mental'
The woman said everything appeared fine until she insisted he use contraception.
She told the trial: "He started going mental. He started punching me on the face and pulling my hair.
"I gave him the money back. I felt if I did not, he would go further and it would be a lot worse."
Dehshari then demanded his victim strip despite her pleas to be left alone.
He then raped her before tossing a £20 note at his crying victim.
She said: "He threw it on the ground like I was a piece of rubbish - that's all you are worth."
The court heard she initially did not want to report the rape fearing she would not be believed but later contacted police after confiding in a friend.
DNA link
Dehshari was identified as a suspect after his DNA was found on the victim.
He was then linked to another incident against another prostitute 18 months earlier.
The 21-year-old woman had agreed to go to Dehshari's flat in the Glasgow's Sighthill area after he met her in the city centre on 26 April 2011.
The court heard, once at the property, Dehshari became enraged after again refusing to wear contraception.
He grabbed the woman's hair, pulled out her ear-ring and threw her to the ground.
She managed to escape before alerting police, who found her to be "distressed and dishevelled".
Dehshari had also been accused of attempting to rape the 21 year-old woman, but the jury returned a not guilty verdict, while convicting him of assault and raping the 30-year-old woman.

Mosque Teacher Assaults Students...


A TEACHER at a Blackburn mosque has appeared before the town’s magistrates charged with assaulting two of his pupils.
Catherine Allan, prosecuting, told the court Mahmad Hajat worked at the Cumberland Street Mosque where it was alleged he had ‘grabbed, hit and slapped’ the pupils.
The court heard the two victims were aged seven and eight at the time.
Hajat, 33, of Winchester Street, Blackburn, pleaded not guilty to two charges of assaulting the boys while in a position of trust.

 The magistrates directed the cases should be heard at Preston Crown Court.
Hajat was given bail to appear there on May 29.
Conditions of bail include not to teach at the mosque and not to have unsupervised contact with any child under the age of 16.
A spokesman at the mosque confirmed Hajat was no longer teachingstudents but declined to comment further on the issue until the case had been heard.

Hate preacher Abu Qatada complains his five-bedroom taxpayer funded home is not big enough due to lack of storage space


  • Radical cleric's wife and five children will join him in Jordan, tribunal hears
  • His lawyer says Qatata is unhappy £1,400 a month home lacks storage

  • Promised to leave Britain 'voluntarily' as long as human rights are protected

  • Qatada was denied bail today, and he will stay at Belmarsh Prison

  • Judge says police found USB stick with 'significant jihadist material' on it

Radical cleric Abu Qatada's family will leave Britain with him if he returns to Jordan because the taxpayer-funded home they moved into last Christmas is too small, a tribunal heard today.

The hate preacher will take his wife and five children to the Middle East, his lawyer said, weeks after he pledged to leave the UK 'voluntarily' as long as his human rights are protected.

Qatada has said he will leave Britain when a treaty is ratified which will ensure him a safe trial after more than a decade of attempts to deport him.

The 53-year-old, who is currently in Belmarsh Prison, lives in North London with his family on state handouts said to total £1,400 a month, with the failure to kick him out if Britain already costing taxpayers more than £3million, including £500,000 on surveillance.

House
David Cameron is considering a temporary withdrawal from the European human rights convention in order to finally remove Abu Qatada from Britain
Breakthrough: Abu Qatada, pictured leaving his old house, says the home the taxpayer has rented for him in North London (left) since December, which cannot be fully shown for legal reasons, is too small

Today his lawyer told a hearing of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission that the terror suspect - real name Mohammed Othman - expects to be acquitted when he stands trial on terror charges and argued for him to be released on bail. But the bail application failed.

Danny Friedman told the court the charges against his client on involvement in a bomb plot were 'tainted'.

He also said the family were unhappy about the size of the house they had been placed in by the Home Office.

The taxpayer-funded residence does not have enough storage space for all the family's possessions, he said.

It is understood there is no legal basis for forcibly removing his family as two of the children were born in Britain.

Couple: Abu Qatada shopping with his wife near his home five years ago. His lawyer said today she and his five children will leave Britain with him should he go
Couple: Abu Qatada shopping with his wife near his home five years ago. His lawyer said today she and his five children will leave Britain with him should he go

Qatada's lawyer said this morning he should be released on bail to give him 'a period of time with that family in which he and they can prepare to leave the country'.

Butr immigration judge Mr Justice Irwin refused to grant him bail and said: 'We regard these breaches as serious. It was the appellant’s obligation to understand the conditions of bail and ensure they were adhered to.

'A serious matter relating to the breaches of bail was revealed during the hearing.

'In his witness statement, the appellant assured the Commission that nothing would be found on any of these items other than schoolwork or other innocent material.

'This assurance has proved untrue. Significant jihadist material has been found on a USB stick seized.'

The Home Office released this image of Home Secretary Theresa May signing the fair trial guarantees with Jordan that she believes will reassure courts that torture evidence would not be used against Abu Qatada
The Home Office released this image of Home Secretary Theresa May signing the fair trial guarantees with Jordan that she believes will reassure courts that torture evidence would not be used against Abu Qatada

Mr Justice Irwin continued: 'There is no doubt about the national security threat which the appellant presents.
'The essence of that is promulgation of his views in support of violence, and the potential effect on others of that promulgation.'

Mr Justice Irwin went on: 'This appellant has in the past fled in order to avoid a court order, equipping himself with a false passport.

'He is highly intelligent, has a range of sympathetic and supportive contacts, and his risk to national security is undiminished.

'We reject the submission that he can, even now, be relied on to comply with his legal obligations and not to attempt to abscond.'

Labour and Conservative ministers have been trying to deport Qatada for a decade
Still smiling: Labour and Conservative ministers have been trying to deport Qatada for a decade but have failed

The 53-year-old has long demanded to be moved to bigger houses funded by the public purse on the grounds he needs more space for his wife and children.

But local residents in North London have said they were disgusted by Qatada’s claims. One mother of two, who did not want to be named, said when he last moved: ‘Do you have to be a terrorist now to get a bigger house? He already has five bedrooms.’

Mr Friedman told Mr Justice Irwin at the central London hearing that Qatada would not pose a risk of absconding from bail and should be let out of Belmarsh.

KEY EVENTS IN ABU QATADA'S BATTLE AGAINST DEPORTATION

September 16 1993 - The Jordanian father of five claims asylum when he arrives in Britain on a forged passport.
May 1998 - He applies for indefinite leave to remain in Britain.
April 1999 - He is convicted in his absence on terror charges in Jordan and sentenced to life imprisonment.
February 2001 - Arrested by police over involvement in a plot to bomb Strasbourg Christmas market. Officers find him with £170,000 in cash, including an envelope marked 'For the mujahedin in Chechnya'.
August 2005 - The preacher is arrested under immigration rules as the Government seeks to deport him to Jordan.
April 2008 - The Court of Appeal rules that deporting him would breach his human rights because evidence used against him in Jordan may have been obtained through torture.
February 18 2009 - In a landmark judgment, five Law Lords unanimously back the Government's policy of removing terror suspects from Britain on the basis of assurances from foreign governments. It is ruled he can be deported to Jordan to face terror charges.

April 18 2012 - Abu Qatada lodges an appeal - potentially delaying his deportation by months.
March 6 2013 - He is returned to jail over fears the terror suspect was trying to communicate with associates, in breach of bail conditions.
March 27 2013 - Court of Appeal admits hate preacher is 'very dangerous' but rules sending him to face a terror trial in Jordan would not be fair.
April 17 2013 - Home Office says it will take its battle to the Supreme Court.
April 23 2013 - Court of Appeal rejects government request to appeal.
Qatada was put back in prison in March over breaches of his strict bail conditions.

He has pledged to leave Britain voluntarily despite winning rulings from British and the European Court of Human Rights that he could not be deported to his home country.

His change of heart follows the signing of a treaty between the UK and Jordan which will ensure evidence from torture cannot be used against him at trial.

The agreement is yet to be ratified by the Jordanian Parliament.

The Government has been trying to deport Qatada for nearly a decade. He was con
victed of terror charges in his absence in 1999.

His bail conditions prevent him from turning mobile phones on at his taxpayer-funded home in London.

A total of 17 mobile phones, three USB sticks, one SD card, five digital media devices and 55 recordable CDs or DVDs were found at the property.

Qatada is also being investigated by Scotland Yard over suspected extremist material found during the search of his home.

He was once described by a Spanish judge as 'Osama bin Laden's right hand man in Europe'.

The breakthrough is a victory for Theresa May, who announced last month that she had thrashed out a mutual assistance treaty with Jordan, guaranteeing Qatada the right to a fair trial.

Human rights judges in Britain and Strasbourg had halted his removal to Jordan on the grounds some of the evidence used against him may have been obtained by torture. Mr Fitzgerald said Mrs May’s treaty had been the key development in the case.

His lawyer said last month: ‘In light of that treaty I’m authorised to say that if, and when, the Jordanian parliament ratifies the treaty he will voluntarily return to Jordan.’

The new treaty is expected to be ratified in the UK next month and a Jordanian minister has suggested it could be cleared in his country within a matter of months.




Nine go on trial for grooming and abusing young girls


A group of Asian men “trafficked, raped or sexually abused” young girls after bombarding them with gifts and attention, a court has heard.

Mohammed Younis, 59, Noshad Hussain, 19, Mohammed Islam Choudhrey, 52, and Marhoof Khan, 32: Nine go on trial for grooming and abusing young girls
Image 1 of 3
Mohammed Younis, 59, Noshad Hussain, 19, Mohammed Islam Choudhrey, 52, and Marhoof Khan, 32 Photo: NEWSTREAM
The men, all from Telford, Shrops, were charged with a total of 56 counts relating to eight girls aged between 13 and 17, who naively believed themselves to be “loved and in love”.
Deborah Gould, prosecuting, warned the jury that as the trial unfolded they would be introduced to a world “that I expect few of you were aware of”.
She said: "This case is about exploitation. The Crown say that the men in the dock variously trafficked, raped or sexually abused girls both over and under the age of 16 years over a considerable period of time.
"You will neither like nor be impressed by the behaviour, attitudes and morals of some of the defendants in this case, most of whom are married men and the teenage girls who feature in this case.”
The court heard how the girls were “slowly but surely” groomed through a combination of attention, gifts, encouragement, pressure and guilt.
Abdul Rouf, 34, and the oldest defendant Mohammed Younis, 59 used their homes as brothels to allow men to engage in sexual activities with girls, it is alleged.
"Having established that their victims were prepared to accommodate that to please them, the next logical step was to encourage them to do this for payment," Mrs Gould told the jury.
The brothers used one girl as a child prostitute and transported her to different locations to meet men, assisted by Noshad Hussain, 20.
The court heard they would ply the 15-year-old with drink, drugs, cannabis and cigarettes and encourage her to have sex with others as a '”favour' to them.
On one occasion, she was driven to a park in Stoke-on-Trent to meet a man, whilst two of the girls were groomed in a churchyard in Telford where young Asian males congregated to drink and smoke.
Ahdel Ali, 23, Mubarek Ali, 28, Tanveer Ahmed, 39, Mohammed Ali Sultan, 24, Noshad Hussain, 21, Mohammed Islam Choudrey, 52, Marhoof Khan, 33, Mohammed Younis, 59 and Abdul Rouf, 34, deny all the charges, which range from controlling, facilitating, causing or inciting child prostitution, conspiracy to incite child prostitution rape, sexually activity with a child and trafficking in the UK for sexual exploitation as well as meeting child following sexual grooming.
The trial continues.

Friday, May 17, 2013

WOMEN CONVERTS TO ISLAM ‘DISCOVER’ ABUSE AND OPPRESSION


University of Cambridge is revealing the depth of the human idiocy trapped in absurd liberalism: Western women ‘discovering’ that their conversion to Islam ends in physical abuse and oppression! The Times has given a preamble to a new study on Islamic conversions. This should be an u-duh moment for all the liberals choosing to convert to the most violent, oppressive and evil cult on earth. These women have no excuses for their new-found discovery. And what is that discovery? That after converting to Islam, they are subject to abuse by their husbands that they don’t want to report! They also complain about oppression against women encouraged by mosques. Duh…!
Media is full of reports about Muslim conduct not only in their home countries, but around the world. Not a single Muslim society on the face of the earth have democracy, freedom or equality. Then, how utterly stupid can you be to convert to a faith that loves to abuse and rape women?
Sorry, but there is no pity from our side. Let these liberal learn reality the hard way. For years and years they have been screaming in defense of Islam, and now they learn that all that they heard from those they accused of bigotry was actually the truth and nothing but the truth.
The conversion to Islam in the UK where this study was made is actually tiny, with only 5,000 conversions per year of which nearly 80% leave Islam in less than three years. Media is blowing these small numbers out of proportion (mainly stemming from Muslim journalists and regurgitated endlessly) claiming that Islam is the ‘fastest’ growing religion. There are no conversion ceremonies in Christianity, Hinduism or Buddhism and therefore it is impossible to compare. The other faiths are free of choice and do not impose imprisoned regimes  on their followers and cannot therefore be measured in the same respect. The growth to Islam in the UK is mainly by birth rate, by asylum, by general immigration, by illegal immigration, and by  forced prison conversion, with a tiny number of 5,000 a year by voluntary conversion.
In Muslim countries minorities are converting by force to avoid death threats and execution. In contrast, the church has found that over 6 million Muslims PER YEAR convert to Christianity in Africa alone. The numbers are staggering in other parts of the Muslim world. We have number for other countries too and you’d be shocked at the numbers shared by the Church, but we do not wish to publish them because persecution of Muslims for apostasy are very high and relentless in these countries. To protect them we will keep the numbers secret.
.
white Muslim women listens
.Women converts to Islam risk rejection and abuse
Ruth Gledhill Religion Correspondent
Published at 12:01AM, May 17 2013
Women who convert to Islam often find themselves at the “nexus of a clash of civilisations,” according to a new report. Converts become confused between what is faith and what is culture in their new Muslim community, with “dress etiquette” one of the first challenges.
The issue of domestic violence was also a problem, with some converts finding it harder to escape an abusive husband because they were reluctant to admit to such problems after changing their faith…..
.

Narratives of Conversion

the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Centre of Islamic Studies, University of Cambridge
Sign reading "Allah"

A project concluding this weekend examines why women choose to convert to Islam – and what the experience is like.

A landmark project which seeks to map out the different routes through which women convert to Islam, and describe their experiences on entering the faith, reaches its conclusion this weekend.
“Narratives of Conversion to Islam in Britain”, which is being run at the Centre of Islamic Studies at the University of Cambridge in association with the New Muslims Project at Leicesester, is collating the views and stories of female converts in an effort to provide an insider’s view of what the experience is really like. A report, detailing the results of three meetings exploring why they chose Islam, their feelings about doing so, and the responses of family, friends and other Muslims, will be published in the spring.
Those involved in the project will remain anonymous until the final report is released, as a condition of their participation. They include women from a range of age groups, variously of white, African, and Caribbean descent. Among them are former Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs and atheists.
Organisers say that one of the main reasons for the project is “a general sense of frustration” with one-dimensional portrayals of female conversion in the media. Often these focus on women who marry into the faith, and suggest that they do so at the expense of their independence and liberty.
The reality, academics say, is far more varied and complex. “Judging by what the media tends to write about Islam, you would expect liberal-minded, intellectually-engaged women from non-Muslim backgrounds to give it a wide berth,” Professor Yasir Suleiman, who is chairing the meetings and the project’s leader, said.
“It seems to be a religion that clashes with our ideas about modernity. Yet the paradox is that there is a noticeable number of well-educated, intellectually-engaged women with high-flying careers who are choosing to become Muslims. So the question is, how do we explain this?”
Although there are no firm statistics about women converting to Islam in Britain, it is possible that as many as three-quarters of British converts – an estimated 100,000 between 2000 and 2010, were female. To investigate why women convert, three symposia organised by the Centre of Islamic Studies were developed based on an initial discussion in May last year. The subsequent gatherings touched on questions such as family, dress, lifestyle, relationships within the Muslim community, marriage, the media, sexuality, political identity and the tenets of the faith itself.
Despite the myriad reasons for women converting to Islam – which, contrary to popular belief, often do not involve marriage – the project team say that a consistent, emerging theme is that many stressed a strong sense of continuity with the past. Although outsiders view conversion as a break with a previous life, and in extreme cases apparently “racialise” white converts as if they have somehow become non-white by joining the faith, the women who make the change retain many of their fundamental beliefs and relationships.
Why they convert is a highly complex question, however. In some cases, women simply came into contact with the Qur’an and found that it struck a spiritual chord – sometimes one that, given their background, they initially found it hard to accept. Other cases recorded in the discussions included those of journalists who, dispatched by their editors to write a piece about the restricted lives of female converts, were in practice won over to the merits of Islam itself.
The final report will, organisers say, attempt to portray the experience of conversion in full by expressing the participants’ feelings and stories whether positive or negative. Women who are attracted to Islam because it seems versatile and inclusive, for example, sometimes find themselves struggling with the more conservative views of Imams. Others have encountered a sense of triumphalism from some “heritage Muslims”, who are keen to show off white converts to the wider world because of their social origins, rather than because of their beliefs.
“The report will attempt to describe and explain the journeys converts take in full,” Professor Suleiman added. “The stories are very different, but the women who tell them have consistently stressed that they don’t see conversion to Islam as a break from the past, but part of one greater, continuing journey as a whole.”
The final report from the project, Narratives of Conversion to Islam in Britain will be published online by the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Centre of Islamic Studies, University of Cambridge, in April or May 2012.


Tuesday, May 14, 2013

7 more muslim pedos


(Top L-R) Mohammed Karrar, Bassam Karrar, Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar, (Bottom) Kamar Jamil, Assad Hussain, Zeesham AhmedThe court heard how the men drugged the girls and took them to towns and cities to be raped

Related Stories

Seven members of a sex grooming ring have been convicted of abusing children from Oxford.
An Old Bailey jury heard six girls were drugged and suffered sadistic abuse while aged between 11 and 15.
The court heard victims were plied with alcohol and drugs before being forced to perform sex acts. Some had also been beaten, burned and threatened.
Eight men had denied charges including rape, arranging child prostitution and trafficking between 2004 to 2012.
The judge told the guilty men: "You have been convicted of the most serious offences and long custodial sentences are inevitable."
They are due to be sentenced on 26 June.
Brothers convicted
The abuse began in Oxford but some of the victims would be later taken around the country to be offered to other men who were in contact with the gang.
The court heard how the men identified vulnerable girls for abuse then groomed each one of them until they were under the control of the gang.
Kamar Jamil, 27, and brothers Akhtar Dogar, 32, and Anjum Dogar, 31, and were convicted of rape, facilitating child prostitution and trafficking.
Assad Hussain, 32, was convicted of two counts of sexual activity with a child.
Mohammed Karrar, 38, was found guilty of rape of a child under 13 and procuring abortion, conspiracy to rape, child prostitution and trafficking.
Mohammed Karrar's brother Bassam, 33, was found guilty of rape and conspiracy to rape girls under 13, child prostitution and trafficking.
Zeeshan Ahmed, 27, was found guilty of sexual activity with a child.
Mohammed Hussain, 24, was found not guilty of sexual activity with a child.
Following the verdicts there was a scuffle in the dock as Ahmed struck out at Mohammed Hussain when he was cleared of the charges against him.
Sold for sex
The Old Bailey was told the key members of the group used and abused the six victims in a systematic and organised sex trafficking ring over eight years until their arrest in 2012.
The abuse would always begin in Oxford but some of the victims would be taken around the country to be offered to other men who were in contact with the gang.
The court heard how the men identified vulnerable girls for abuse and then groomed each one of them until they were under the control of the gang.
They were then each either abused by the men themselves, given to their friends or offered at a price to others who were not on trial.
The youngest girl to be targeted was 11 years old. The girls were mostly chosen because their unsettled or troubled lives made them easier to manipulate.

Temporary marriage on the rise



The temporary marriage, or nikah mut'ah, is an ancient Islamic practice that unites man and woman as husband and wife for a limited time. Historically it was used so that a man could have a wife for a short while when travelling long distances. So why are young British Muslims adopting the practice now?
"It allowed us to meet without breaking the bounds of Sharia [Islamic law]. We both wanted to date, to go out for dinner or go shopping and just get to know each other better before getting married, which we wouldn't have been able to do otherwise," says Sara.
She is a 30-year-old pharmacist from Birmingham, a Shia Muslim of Pakistani heritage.
'It's basically a contract'
Sara was temporarily married for six months before committing to a full marriage to her partner.
"It's basically a contract. You sit down and stipulate your conditions - for a girl who hasn't been previously married, you do need the father's permission," she said.
"We stipulated the duration, my father's conditions, and I requested what you would call a dowry where the guy gives a gift to the girl. It's simple, straightforward and doesn't take long at all," Sara added.


She is one of a significant number of young British Muslims using a temporary marriage as a way of balancing their religious beliefs with their modern Western lifestyle.
Because of the informal nature of the union there are no official statistics to show how many temporary marriages there are in the UK. But a number of senior Shia Muslim scholars and Muslim student organisations told BBC Asian Network there is something of a revival.
'Taboo subject'
There is a sectarian divide among Muslims on temporary marriage. The mut'ah is practised by Shia Muslims while Sunni Muslims generally consider it haram - forbidden.
The mut'ah is particularly popular on university campuses and, according to Omar Farooq Khan, president of the Ahlul Bayt Islamic Society at Bradford University, the practice is on the increase among Shia students.


"Definitely nikah mut'ah is on the rise now due to students becoming more aware about it. Students are educated people so obviously they look around for a solution to their problems from an Islamic perspective," said Mr Khan.
"What else are they going to do? They can't just have a cold shower because it doesn't work and otherwise they just end up doing the haram thing and having a girlfriend or boyfriend. Many people won't talk about it though, because it is still a taboo subject," he added.
'Strictly not allowed'
Khola Hassan, a Sunni Muslim and spokesperson for the UK Islamic Sharia Council, says the practice is strictly not allowed. She says it is equal to prostitution because of the time limit applied to the union.
"I have never come across a Sunni scholar, throughout history, who declares mut'ah marriage to be halal," said Mrs Hassan.

The nikah mut'ah consists of a verbal or written contract in which both parties agree the length of time and conditions for the marriage.
"There is no difference between mut'ah marriage and prostitution. There is a time limit on the marriage, and the mahr given as a gift [from the man to the woman] is the equivalent as a payment to a prostitute," she added.
The union can last for a few hours, days, months or years and when the contract ends so does the marriage.
It can include stipulations such as "no physical contact" - or "no funny business", as one parent put it - and the procedure is completed with the mahr.
Sayyad Fadhil Milani, spiritual leader at the Al-Khoei Centre in Brent, north-west London, is widely regarded as the UK's most senior Shia Islamic scholar and has written about the mut'ah marriage in his book Islamic Family Law.
Sectarian divide
"At the time of  Muhammad it was practised widely, especially when men were travelling away from home on business or at war," he said.
Ayatollah Milani said: "Islam does not permit relationships like those between a boyfriend and a girlfriend. So a nikah mut'ah gives them an opportunity to get to know each other before committing themselves to a full marriage."
"So some Muslims [in this case Sunni Muslims] are against it because they follow the interpretation and the suggestion made by the second Caliph. The Shias say that we stick to the Koran and the practices of the Prophet."
He admits there is a sectarian divide over the issue: "Umar [ibn al-Khattab, the second Caliph of Islam], himself said that the mut'ah was lawful at the time of the Prophet but he banned it and said he would punish everyone who does it.
Although nikah mut'ah is a Shia concept, other types of informal marriages are practised by Sunni Muslims, such as misyar and urfi.
Misyar allows a couple to live separately through mutual agreement while urfi is done without the public approval of the bride's guardians. Neither of these, however, has time limits as with nikah mut'ah.
Way of legitimising sex
Critics of these informal marriages, both Sunni and Shia, argue they allow a person to have multiple sexual partners and are used as an "Islamic cover" for prostitution or the exploitation of women, with men taking on multiple "wives" for a number of hours.
In these circumstances many of the formalities and parental permissions are dispensed with for the temporary marriage agreement.
BBC Asian Network heard numerous cases of it being used simply as a way of religiously legitimising sex.
Omar Ali Grant, a convert to Shia Islam, from London, has had around 13 temporary marriages but argues that he was just trying to find the right person to spend his life with.
 He conceded they could be used as a cover for premarital sex.
But he said: "Sex is not haram per se. In Islam sex doesn't have negative connotations; it is not impure and is not dirty.
"What Islam is saying is sex has to be between consenting adults who are also responsible.
 Very often it is said that temporary marriage may amount to some prostitution, but it is not that. Prostitution does occur in certain areas of Muslim society, but then again prostitution happens everywhere," said Mr Grant.
Temporary marriage, or mut'a, is the practice of entering into a marriage with a time limit: the couple is married only for a night, or a week, or whatever time period their agreement specifies. So in other words, it is prostitution under the guise of morality. Temporary wives are found in large numbers in seminary towns where young clerics-in-training are away from home and lonely.
This is a Shi'ite concept that mainstream Sunnis ostensibly reject; the Shi'ites point out that Muhammad allowed it, while the Sunnis maintain that he later abolished the practice. Shi'ites also justify it by reference to Qur'an 4:24, which says: "And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done)." They see in that reference to "what ye do by mutual agreement" the allowance of a time limit.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Muslim gang leaders, 16, named and shamed for leading intimidation campaign which left pensioners too scared to leave their homes


A pair of 'lawless' schoolboy gang leaders who terrorised elderly people in their neighbourhood have been ordered by a court to 'grow up' or face jail.

Ali Iqbal and Haider Farooq - who dubbed themselves 'the Invincibles' - were the leaders of a  gang of youths that ran rampage around Brierfield in Lancashire; smashing windows, vandalising cars, and deliberately intimidating vulnerable people and pensioners.

Local residents described how the 16-year-olds turned the area into 'hell on earth', leaving some elderly people too terrified to step outside their front doors.

Haider Farooq and Iqbal dubbed themselves 'the Invincibles'
Ali Iqbal terrorised a Lancashire neighbourhood
'Lawless': Ali Iqbal, left, and Haider Farooq, right, both 16, ran rampage around Brierfield, Lancashire

Iqbal and Farooq were named and shamed at Reedley Magistrates' Court today, as they were served with a two-year ASBO and threatened with up to five years in jail unless they start to behave.

The pair, who swore at passersby outside the court, had been convicted of attempted theft and criminal damage at earlier hearings.

Details of their campaign of intimidation emerged after victims agreed to keep diaries of their ordeals over an eight-month period. 

The court heard how the pair raided local buses taking hammers that were in place in case of emergencies, stole wheelie bins, and jumped on cars.

'You need to really grow up... this is your last chance'

JP Brian Pickup
 
A JP told the duo - who police said 'had no respect for anyone or anything' - the order was their 'last chance'.

Farooq said at today's hearing: 'No more messing about.'

JP Brian Pickup replied: 'You need to really grow up while you have got the chance before the authorities take the view that you need to be put somewhere that can impose some sort of discipline.

'It is not really the right words "messing about". 


'Taking hammers, breaking windows, damaging cars, you would realise the potential if that happened to you.

'If you parked your car outside and it got smashed by someone, would you just think "he is only messing about"? I think you would take a slightly different view,' Mr Pickup said,.

'Have you thought about the consequences, causing your mother and family heartache?' the JP went on.

'This is your last chance, maybe down the line in six to 12 months the order will be adjusted, if not you are going to suffer. Make sure you go away and are a credit to your families.'

'Hell on earth': Elderly residents of Brierfield, Lancashire (pictured), were afraid to leave their homes as the pair ran rampage around the neighbourhood
'Hell on earth': Elderly residents of Brierfield, Lancashire (pictured), were afraid to leave their homes as the pair ran rampage around the neighbourhood

After the case police and neighbours said both teenagers - who had been excluded from mainstream education - had brought 'hell on earth' to the area.

They had initially been offered 'acceptable behaviour' contracts to avoid court action - but refused to sign.

PC Tony Feather said: 'They think they are invincible and called themselves as much, and they believed it was acceptable to go on a rampage targeting vulnerable and elderly people. It has just escalated, they have no respect for anyone or anything.

'They built up an entourage of youngsters and smashed up buses and house windows and frightened residents. 

They have been the focal point of a lot of anti-social behaviour and brought terror to their own neighbourhood because they felt comfortable doing it on their own doorstep,' the officer said.

Widower Doreen Baxendale, 76, a retired weaver, said: 'Those two boys are utterly lawless and have no respect for the elders. We never behaved like that at their age. 

'They fight, shout and swear and jump on cars and other things. It's appalling.

'They have even been banging on my door at 2am in the morning and I've had to call the police. 

It's frightening because I live by myself and they make everyone feel very uncomfortable in their own community,' Mrs Baxendale added.

Thomas Bamford, 48, said: 'I have to carry a safety alarm with me if I go out because I am scared of them. I don't tend to leave the house at night.

'They are well known. They kick my doors and have done a lot of damage around here. They take the wheelie bins and smash stuff, they even smashed my windows with stones. I feel very uneasy when young lads are hanging around.'

The order will prevent the boys from associating with four other males in a public place in Pendle for two years. 

They are also prohibited from a mapped area of Pendle - which also includes their residential area - unless accompanied by an adult aged 18 or over.

Local Labour Councillor Nawaz Ahmed said: 'These boys were involved in disgraceful behaviour and we have put up with these problems for too long.

'The lads are going around making a nuisance and the community will not tolerate it. This is the only area in Pendle where crime has increased, everywhere else has decreased.

'I also believe this is the parents' responsibility as well. I hope this will deter them and others too. Residents are fed up, the boys are out every night bringing fear to the area and insulting people. It is not fair. I hope this puts them back on the straight and narrow,' the councillor said.