INFIDEL PRINCE CHARLES MUSLIM?

What will Charles, the infidel, do when they come to behead him?

Prince Charles has endorsed the sharia—the Islamic "legal code" using the Koran’s killing and maiming passages for settling legal disputes, according to Daniel Pipes’ "Is Prince Charles a Convert to Islam?" It is the sharia that permits the Afghan judge to behead a Christian on the grounds that he is a Christian.Charles has lauded Islamic women, though Muslim males consider females less than dung. Further, non-Muslim "whores" are asking for rape because they are sans head gear, hence gang rapes especially recently throughout Europe.He has voiced the solution to British problems—Islam, "the peace religion."He has established a "panel of twelve ‘wise men’ to advise him on Islamic religion and culture," according to Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman. If he means by "culture" honor killing, back whippings in the public square, noose hangings alongside the roads, beheadings, so be it.He, visiting Oman, took extra time and patience in ahhing and oohing over the Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque, taking "keen interest in studying various sections of the mosque, including the main prayer hall," according to the Dubai-based Gulf News.He ogled over an exhibit of Muslim calligraphy as well as met with Sheikha Aisah Al Siaby, Head of Public Authority of Craft Industries and Taha Al Kisri, the head of Omani Society for Fine Arts.He folded his legs, seated on the floor, eating and drinking juice at the beckoning of the Iftar, "breaking fast with people of different nationalities." In breaking the fast, it is interesting that he actually kept the Ramadan fast.He called together Muslims for a "summit" at Clarence House. Also present were Christian leaders. Charles was seeking from them some sort of peace package to hand to the world. Muslims were not at all pleased that Christians had been invited; therefore, the conclave was disappointing to the Prince.He excused the London Muslim bombing carnage when 55 were slaughtered by Islamic murderers global. His analysis: don’t blame Islam for what a few idiots do. He saged: "It is vital that everyone resists the temptation to condemn the Muslim community." This was an echo of the Muslim Council of Britain. How coincidental.He has proclaimed that henceforth he cannot envision himself being merely the "defender of the (Christian) faith" but the "defender of faith." In other words, Charles apparently does not see the particularization of the Christian faith but instead regards all religions as "the faith." At least the Archbishop of Canterbury bristled over that projection. Charles and the Archbishop do not actually get along that well on a variety of themes.He tried to convince US President George W. Bush that Islam is harmless, that is, when Charles visited Mr. Bush in the Oval Office last October. It might have worked. Since then Mr. Bush in his State of the Union address spoke of the killing cult as a "noble faith."The Sunday Telegraph’s Andrew Alderson stated that Charles "will try to persuade George W Bush and Americans of the merits of Islam this week because he thinks the United States has been too intolerant of the religion since September 11."The Prince, who leaves on Tuesday for an eight-day tour of the US, has voiced private concerns over America's ‘confrontational’ approach to Muslim countries and its failure to appreciate Islam's strengths."He, in January, spoke glowingly of Shar’I banking products. He addressed a London conclave of the Islamic Development Bank: "I am certain that with the support of the Islamic Development Bank my charities will be able to increase their efforts to address the challenges we face in Britain's cities and help those younger British Muslims who feel they have little or no stake in society to play a fuller part in the country's affairs by promoting community and entrepreneurial development."What will Charles, the infidel, do when they come to behead him?Footnote:Obviously Charles has yet to be educated on the Islamic demonic baseline: Muslim men slit their females' throats if they have dishonored the clan; it is "honor killing."Muslim men have several wives as well as "temporary wives" who are in fact prostitutes who live with their parents and receive no financial aid from the sex master.Muslim men cane their wives, beat their wives, demean their wives by giving them no education, no profession, no freedom of movement, no communication with anyone but Muslims.Muslim fathers cut with scissors and razors their daughters' genitals while the mothers strap them down.Muslims commit no crime when their acts are for Allah; therefore, murder, robbery, rape, molestation, plundering, lying are pious acts, not crimes.Muslims abide by the sharia--the "legal code" based on killing and maiming verses of the Koran.Muslims offer their children as suicide offerings to Allah.Muslims pray at mosques on Fridays in order for Allah to empower them for Islam world rule.Muslim mosques are satanic covens, clerics are the devil's missionaries, the Koran has been scribed by demons, demented Mohammed was devil-possessed and the so-called "religion" is a killing cult like none other, presently worldwide.Muslims cannot convert to another religion for they will be slain.Muslims do not expect dialogue with non-Muslims; they expect compliance.Muslims regard Jews as "Jew-pigs and monkeys."Muslim regard Christians as the enemy in need of eternal hell fire.Muslims punish their own by gouging out eyes, cutting off feet, hands, fingers, toes, noses.Muslims flog and hang by the noose those suspected of offenses or committing the slightest offense.Muslims burn churches and slaughter Christians daily throughout the world, e.g., Sudan, Koxovo, etc.Furthermore, evidently the Prince has not read the source of Islam's "peace." It's right there in the "holy book" Koran:

Quran Surah 2: The CowDon't bother to warn the disbelievers. Allah has blinded them. Theirs will be an awful doom. 6Allah has sickened their hearts. A painful doom is theirs because they lie. 10A fire has been prepared for the disbelievers, whose fuel is men and stones. 24Disbelievers will be burned with fire. 39, 90For disbelievers is a painful doom. 104For unbelievers: ignominy in this world, an awful doom in the next. 114Allah will leave the disbelievers alone for a while, but then he will compel them to the doom of Fire. 126The doom of the disbelievers will not be lightened. 162They will not emerge from the Fire. 167Those who hide the Scripture will have their bellies eaten with fire. Theirs will be a painful doom. 174How constant are they in their strife to reach the Fire! 175Kill disbelievers wherever you find them. If they attack you, then kill them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. 191War is ordained by Allah. 216Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 217Disbelievers worship false gods. They will burn forever in the Fire. 257Quran Surah 4: WomenThose who disobey Allah and his messenger will be burnt with fire and suffer a painful doom. 14For the disbelievers, We have prepared a painful doom. 18For disbelievers, We prepare a shameful doom. 37Hell is sufficient for their burning. 55Unbelievers will be tormented forever with fire. When their skin is burned off, a fresh skin will be provided. 56Allah will bestow a vast reward on those who fight in religious wars. 74Believers fight for Allah; disbelievers fight for the devil. So fight the minions of the devil. 76Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. 89If the unbelievers do not offer you peace, kill them wherever you find them.
Against such you are given clear warrant. 91 ( Offering peace in Islam means surrendering. All 67 out of 68 wars of Muhammad were offensive. They are called qazwah (raid, ambush, sudden attack). That is how Muhammad waged his wars. He raided, massacred and looted civilians with no warning. The one defensive war, 'ditch' was not fought. That is why the Islamic terrorism 'jihad' will continue until the West "offers peace". This was made clear by Bin Laden.)Quran Surah 5: The Table SpreadThose who deny Islam will be losers in the Hereafter. 5Disbelievers are the rightful owners of Hell. 10Those who make war with Allah and his messenger will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. That is how they will be treated in this world, and in the next they will have an awful doom. 33 (Anyone who resist Islam is deemed to be making war with Allah)Disbelievers will have a painful doom. 36Disbelievers will want to come out of the Fire, but will not. Their will be a lasting doom. 37Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, and tooth for tooth. Non-muslims are wrong doers. 45Christians will be burned in the Fire. 72Christians are wrong about the Trinity. For that they will have a painful doom. 73Disbelievers will be owners of hell-fire. 86Quran Surah 8: The Spoils of WarAllah will throw fear into the hearts of the disbelievers, and smite their necks and fingers. 12Disbelievers will be tormented in the Fire. 14When you fight with disbelievers, do not retreat. Those who do will go to hell. 15-16Taste of the doom because ye disbelieve. 35Those who disbelieve will be gathered into hell. 36The angels smite the face and backs of disbelievers, saying: "Taste the punishment of burning!" 50The worst beasts in Allah's sight are the disbelievers. 55Exhort the believers to fight. They will win easily, because disbelievers are without intelligence. 65A prophet may not take captives until he has made a slaughter in the land. 67Surah 9: RepentanceGive tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve. 3Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. 5Don't let idolaters tend the sanctuaries. Their works are in vain and they will be burned in the Fire. 17Give tiding of a painful doom to Christians and Jews. 34If you refuse to fight, Allah will afflict you with a painful doom. 39Disbelievers go to hell. 49Those who vex the Prophet, for them there is a painful doom. 60Those who oppose Allah and His messenger will burn in the fire of hell. 63Allah promises hypocrites and disbelievers the fire of hell. Allah curses them. They will have a lasting torment. 68Fight the disbelievers and hypocrites. Be harsh with them. They are all going to hell anyway. 73Allah will afflict disbelievers with a painful doom in this world and the Hereafter. 74For disbelievers there will be a painful doom. 90Don't pray for idolaters (not even for your family) after it is clear they are people of hell-fire. 113Fight disbelievers who are near you, and let them see the harshness in you.

Did you know that there are 123 verses in the Quran concerning fighting and killing for the cause of Allah?

Al-Qaeda calls Queen an ‘enemy of Islam’

Tycoon wants extremists targeted

A leading Muslim businessman has called on the government to be more "heavy-handed" when tackling extremism.
Sir Gulam Noon said protests from human rights activists should be resisted in some cases to prevent another terror attack in the UK.
He said extremism was a "monster of our making" and that some Muslim preachers were "brainwashing" young people.
Sir Gulam, a major Labour party donor, has advised the government on Muslim matters and was knighted in 2002.
Writing in the Independent newspaper, Sir Gulam welcomed government measures against extremism and said they came "not before time".
"This is not scaremongering: the bombers will try again, and when that happens, many in the Muslim community fear a backlash. The problem is this risks the radicalisation of yet more young Muslims. And so the spiral worsens."
Sir Gulam, who describes himself as "an enthusiast for integration", praises British multi-culturalism and the chances it offered to immigrants like himself.
Sir Gulam is a millionaire who made his fortune in supplying ready-made curries to supermarkets.
The entrepreneur said most Muslims wanted to get on with their lives without the threat of terrorist violence.
Being associated with such violence in the minds of the wider public could lead to a "backlash", he warned.
He said Muslims, especially parents, must do more the stop the "indoctrination" of young people.
But the Muslim community could not do it alone, Sir Gulam added, and said needed help from both the government and relevant authorities.

Prisons failing to tackle terror recruitment

The prison service has no strategy to tackle al-Qaida operatives radicalising and recruiting young African-Caribbean and other ethnic minority prisoners in British jails, according to prison officers.
Britain now houses more suspected terrorist prisoners - the number is in the high hundreds - than any other European country, with many housed on normal wings alongside ordinary offenders.
The Prison Officers' Association says some of these terrorist prisoners are targeting for radicalisation and recruitment other alienated ethnic minority groups, as well as the smaller number of younger Muslim prisoners, and they are providing "rich pickings". Many of those held, whom they describe as "dangerous and highly capable", are "high up" in groups using the al-Qaida name and their lives have been dedicated to radicalising younger and more vulnerable people.
But senior prison managers have admitted in official correspondence that despite being aware of the problem they are waiting for a recently formed extremist prisoner working group to report before they do anything about it.
The POA has warned the government that urgent steps need to be taken to prevent the more dangerous suspected terrorist prisoners engaging in criminal integration and collusion, as well as their adoption of new radicalising and recruitment techniques.
Terror suspects and convicted terrorists are concentrated in high-security prisons, including Belmarsh in London and Woodhill in Milton Keynes. Despite being given the highest security, category A rating, most are kept on normal prison wings as the resources do not exist to deal with them all in separate secure units.
Steve Gough, the POA's vice-chairman, said he did not think there were "al-Qaida-controlled wings" yet in British prisons but said the stage had already been reached where they were recruiting prisoners sharing their cells or impressionable youngsters in the cell next door.
"Prison staff are very good at intelligence-led surveillance but it is difficult gathering intelligence listening to people who are having conversations in languages you don't understand. There are now many high-profile terrorist prisoners locked up on normal location, on normal wings with any other prisoner instead of in special environments."
The shoe bomber Richard Reid, the son of two non-Muslims, a white mother and a Jamaican father, has revealed how being radicalised while inside Feltham young offenders' institution led to his conversion to violent jihadism.
Lord Carlile, the independent watchdog on the government's anti-terror laws, this year identified the recruitment of radicalised youth in prisons as a problem and raised concerns about the activities of a small number of imams in prisons.
But more than a year after the bombings in London highlighted the need to tackle the radicalisation of Muslims the prison service has admitted that it has done little about it.
Peter Atherton, the deputy director-general of the prison service, has told the POA that "while there are some concerns that some people might be radicalised, there is little hard evidence that it is happening to date".
In a letter to Mr Gough, he disclosed that the prison service has recently formed an extremist prisoner working group, but senior managers are waiting for it to report before drawing up a prison service strategy for combating terrorism.
Meanwhile the Metropolitan police special branch has set up an intelligence unit in the prison service headquarters and there is also a system for monitoring terrorists held in high security.
Mr Gough said this response was entirely inappropriate: "This isn't a problem that will occur in the next few years. This is something the prison service should have been planning for since 9/11."

Christians ask if force is needed to protect their religious values

A leading church group which represents more than a million Christians has raised the prospect of civil unrest and even "violent revolution" to protect religious freedoms. In a startling warning to the Government, senior church and political figures have backed a report advocating force to protest against policies that are "unbiblical" and "inimical to the Christian faith". The Christians' report echoes protests made by radical Muslims The menacing language of the report, which Lord Mawhinney, the Tory peer, Andy Reed, the Labour MP, and the Rt Rev Peter Forster, the Bishop of Chester, helped to produce, echoes comments made by Muslim fanatics. Only days ago, Islamic activist Anjem Choudary said Muslims had become radicalised because they were "a community under siege". The report from the Evangelical Alliance says "violent revolution" should be regarded as a viable response if government legislation encroaches further on basic religious rights. The church is urged to come to a consensus that "at some point there is not only the right but the duty to disobey the state". The report, entitled "Faith and Nation", comes amid growing concern that people are being prevented from expressing their faith, including BA's recent decision that an employee could not wear a crucifix. The Government's attempt to introduce religious hatred laws has highlighted the growing threat to religious liberty, the report says. Pope Benedict XVI has also said that God is being pushed to the margins by "secular forces". Proposals to ban proselytising in publicly-funded Christian projects could ultimately lead to Christians being prevented from teaching others about the Bible. This would "be unambiguously recognised by Christians as perpetrating evil that has to be resisted by deliberate acts of defiance", the report says. While it has always been expected that the greatest threat to Britain's security will come from Muslim extremists, the report will cause particular alarm to government ministers as it reveals disquiet among the country's Christian population. Significantly, it comes from the Evangelical Alliance – a mainstream organisation representing 1.2 million Christians. The organisation acknowledges that "resisting evil in the modern state" can take many different forms. Before resorting to force, Christians would normally first turn to dialogue. But in some circumstances "the use of defensive force may become a necessary and legitimate remedy for Christians", it suggests. "If, as most Christians accept, they should be politically involved in democratic processes, many believe this may, where necessary, take the form of active resistance to the state. This may encompass disobedience to law, civil disobedience, involving selective, non-violent resistance or, ultimately, violent revolution." Mike Morris, the executive director of the Evangelical Alliance, said that the report reflected the breadth of submissions they had received. "It is not as if Christians are going to take to the streets, but we need to be able to stand up to things that are challenging the Christian conscience, regardless of the consequences." However, the Very Rev Colin Slee, the Dean of Southwark, said it would send out a confused message. "The fundamental themes of the gospel are love and reconciliation, not violent revolution," he said. The Evangelical Alliance has raised the debate at a time when religious liberty issues are beginning to dominate the headlines following the row over Muslim women's right to wear the veil and BA's decision to suspend Nadia Eweida, 55, for breaching its uniform policy by wearing a cross. Anjem Choudary, who helped organise the anti-Danish cartoon protests, last week said that the London bombings should not have come as a surprise. "How else do you expect Muslims to express themselves?" he said. "We are a community under siege. It's going to blow up one day in everyone's faces." This newspaper revealed last week the increasing anxiety among senior police officers at the change in "the landscape of political protest" since the millennium – prompting them to consider introducing water cannons to control violent street protests. Tarique Ghaffur, the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Force, said last week: "Recent high-profile demonstrations and the actions of individuals or groups at localised protests have served to highlight a complex dynamic emerging in London, built around a potentially volatile mix of issues and increasingly diametrically opposed religious-political viewpoints."

EVERY month

EVERY month without a new 7/7 terror strike lulls us into dangerous false security.
Memories have faded so fast that some would rather condemn police for overkill than praise them for trying to protect us.
So the trial of terror plotter Dhiren Barot is a timely wake-up call.
Barot admits planning bombs big enough to puncture the River Thames and flood the capital’s Tube network.
His targets included mainline stations and top hotels.
And he aimed to paralyse London and New York with simultaneous nuclear dirty bombs.
Barot can’t be dismissed as a harmless fantasist.
He was trained to kill by al-Qaeda. His signed plans were found in Pakistan.
Barot’s confession saves us a long and costly trial.
But security chiefs warn there are hundreds more where he came from — and thousands willing to offer support. It is only a matter of time before some succeed.
We cannot afford to drop our guard for an instant.

Trial halted over lawyer's veil

AN immigration tribunal was halted yesterday after a lawyer twice refused a judge’s request to remove her veil.
Shabnam Mughal was dressed from head to foot in black with a full-face veil leaving just her eyes visible.
Miss Mughal was acting for Sikh businessman Jagdev Singh in his appeal against the Home Office’s refusal to grant his nephew permission to visit the UK.
She was asked to remove the veil by tribunal chairman George Glossop during the hearing in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs.
She declined and the case was adjourned to the afternoon. When it reconvened the judge had to ask Miss Mughal — who is in her twenties — to repeat herself after asking how she spelt her name.
He continued: "I am not very happy that you are appearing in a veil. Would you kindly remove it to assist with communications?
"It will allow me to see your face and I cannot hear you as well as I would like."
She replied: "Sir, we have been through this issue." Miss Mughal later announced: "Sir, I am taking my leave."
The lawyer came back into the courtroom as Judge Glossop spoke to Mr Singh. He asked: "Do you wish to carry on?"
She retorted: "No, I just want to listen to what is being said."
The judge continued: "If you remove your veil, which happens in other cases, we can proceed, otherwise I am going to have consultations with the President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. Will you remove it?"
Miss Mughal countered: "You are clearly aware of my position on the grounds of my religious beliefs. I won’t."
Sir Henry Hodge, head of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunals, will rule on the next move.

read more

plotter jailed for life

"For well over two years we have been unable to show the British public the reality of the threat they faced from this man. Now they can see for themselves the full horror of his plan."

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke

Muslim convert who plotted terror

A Muslim convert planned to detonate a dirty bomb and launch an attack on London's Tube, a court has been told.
Former Hindu Dhiren Barot, 34, from London, plotted "massive explosions" in a synchronised attack in the US and UK.
Barot, who last month admitted conspiracy to murder, wanted to pack limousines with gas cylinders and also use a radioactive "dirty" bomb.
Lawyers for Barot have insisted that he had neither funding nor bomb-making materials at the time he was caught.
Barot, from Kingsbury in north-west London, described by prosecutors as "a member or close associate" of al-Qaeda is to be sentenced on Tuesday.
"The plan was to carry out massive explosions here and in the USA, the principal object being to kill hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent people without warning," prosecutor Edmund Lawson QC told Woolwich Crown Court
"There were plans for the detonation of a radiation dispersal device, more commonly known as a dirty bomb, the use of a petrol tanker to cause an explosion, and an attack on London's rail or Underground network, including the Heathrow Express, of an explosion on a Tube train while in a tunnel under the River Thames."
The prosecution said Barot had written: "Imagine the chaos that would be caused if a powerful explosion were to rip through here [London] and actually rupture the river itself.
"That would cause pandemonium, what with the explosions, flooding, drowning etc that would occur."
Barot also planned to target the IMF and the World Bank in Washington DC.
The New York Stock Exchange building and the Citigroup headquarters, as well as the Prudential building in Newark, New Jersey, were also among his targets.
Barot admired the Madrid train bombings and wrote he was bent on creating "another black day for the enemies of Islam and a victory for the Muslims", Mr Lawson said.
At the heart of Barot's plot was a scheme entitled "gas limos project", uncovered in a document signed by him and found in Pakistan, Mr Lawson said.
Barot had planned to fill limousines with gas cylinders and detonate them in underground car parks near financial institutions.
Mr Lawson said Barot had dubbed the Madrid attacks "the definitive accident" which "deserves to be emulated more than any other". The plotter had travelled to Pakistan to brief his "terrorist masters", the court heard.
Barot's plans for bombings in the US were initiated before the 11 September attacks, then shelved, but worked on as late as February 2004, Mr Lawson maintained.
'Murderous plans'
These US plans were used in the planning of synchronised attacks in the UK, he added.
"The gas limos project might be seen as the culmination of Barot's murderous plans.
"There were various possible methods of attack raised for consideration, including part of what was to be considered for the UK.
"They included parking limousines packed with explosives next to or underneath the target buildings, arson, by means of hijacked petrol tankers, or igniting gas cylinders and even possibly the use of an aeroplane."
The court heard how Barot had used false identities, and at least one false passport, and had only been caught because of a "meticulous and impressive" police operation with input from British, American and Pakistani intelligence.
The prosecution said Barot had first received training in the use of weapons and explosives in 1995 in a mountainous area near the disputed territory of Kashmir.

How the bomb plot would have worked

Jailed terror plotter is Bin Laden's 'UK general'

CAN YOU FEEL THE PEACE?

This year the Religion of Peace racked up well over

1600 dead bodies and 291 deadly terror attacks in 17

countries across the globe during its holiest month!

bishop tells it like it is..

get ready for the death threats and whinning.

A senior Anglican bishop has accused many Muslims of being guilty of double standards in their view of the world.
The Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, told the Sunday Times some had a "dual psychology" in which they sought "victimhood and domination".
The bishop, whose father converted from Islam, also said there were situations in which society could require Muslim women not to wear full-face veils.
Society required recognition and identification in teaching, he said.
Mr Nazir-Ali argued it would never be possible to satisfy all of the demands made by Muslims because "their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when Muslims are victims... and always wrong when Muslims are the oppressors or terrorists".
He compared Bosnia and Kosovo, where he said Muslims were oppressed, with the powerful position of the Taleban in Afghanistan, who he said had been the oppressors.
He added: "Given the world view that has given rise to such grievances, there can never be sufficient appeasement and new demands will continue to be made."
Veil debate
The bishop's comments on the use of full-face veils by Muslim women add to the debate sparked by Commons Leader Jack Straw, a former foreign secretary, last month.
He disclosed that he asks Muslim women to remove the veil when they attend his Blackburn constituency surgeries.
Mr Straw also suggested that Muslim women who wear veils over their faces can make community relations harder.
In the Sunday Times, Mr Nazir-Ali referred to a "huge increase" in the wearing of Muslim dress in Egypt, Pakistan and Malaysia.
He said: "I can see nothing in Islam that prescribes the wearing of the full-face veil.
"In the supermarket those at the cash till need to be recognised. Teaching is another profession in which society requires recognition and identification."
Dr Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, entered the veil debate last month by saying people should be free to wear visible religious symbols.
He said aiming for a society where no symbols such as veils, crosses, sidelocks or turbans would be seen was "politically dangerous".

"The two main causes of the present situation [rising extremism] are fundamentalist imams and material on the internet." He proposed to filter out imams who might whip up extremism: "They must be vetted for appropriate qualifications, they must have a reasonable knowledge of the English language and they must take part in a recognised process of learning about British life and culture."The government, after lobbying from Muslim groups, retreated from proposals to toughen entry requirements put forward by David Blunkett, the former home secretary, two years ago. Plans to require foreign clerics to sit a test on British civic values a year after arriving were cancelled along with the introduction of a requirement to speak English to conversational level.

Nazir-Ali, who was born in Pakistan and whose father converted from Islam to Catholicism, said radical Islam was being taught in mosque schools across Britain. "While radical teaching may not be happening everywhere, its presence is felt across the country. It affects all Muslims," he said.

Muslim Council of Britain shill Muhammad Abdul Bari proves Nazir-Ali’s point with a veiled threat:
Muhammad Abdul Bari, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, told the Sunday Times such remarks could affect "community relationships".

Muslim 'wanted new 9/11'

On trial for inciting murder during Cartoon Rage protests. "Muslim 'wanted new 9/11,'" from The Sun:
A MUSLIM accused of inciting murder during a protest wanted a new 9/11 across Europe, a court heard yesterday.
Mizanur Rahman, 23, was also said to have called for the "indiscriminate killing" of American and British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He is alleged to have made the remarks as he demonstrated outside the Danish Embassy in London after cartoons depicting Muhammad appeared in a Danish newspaper.
Rahman is said to have told fellow demonstrators: "Oh Allah, we want to see another 9/11 in Iraq, another 9/11 in Denmark, another 9/11 in Spain, in France, all over Europe. Oh Allah, destroy all of them."


The Old Bailey was told he was filmed carrying placards with the slogans "let’s annihilate those who insult Islam" and "behead those who insult Islam".
Mr Rahman also called for a wave of attacks across Europe in the manner of 11 September, Mr Perry said. A video of his megaphone-amplified speech would be played to the Old Bailey jury.
'Not about Allah'
He allegedly told fellow demonstrators: "Oh Allah, we want to see another 9/11 in Iraq... in Denmark... in Spain... in France... all over Europe. Oh Allah, destroy all of them."
And Mr Perry said Mr Rahman had also spoken of the British and American forces in Iraq, saying: "The Mujahideen will destroy them and their freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan, in Falluja and in Baghdad.
"We don't want to see them in Baghdad, in Iraq any more. We want to see them coming home in body bags, we want to see their blood running in the streets of Baghdad, we want to see their blood running in Fallujah.
"We want to see the Mujahideen shoot down their planes the way we shoot down birds, we want to see their tanks burn in the way we burn their flags."
The prosecution emphasised that freedom of speech did not stretch to inciting the murder of religious opponents.
Mr Perry said: "This case is not a trial of Islam. This case is not about Allah or Muhammad."
The case continues.

Sheep sex immigrant caged

AN asylum seeker had sex with a ewe as its "male partner" looked on, a court heard.
Factory worker Hidyat Amin — who came to Britain from Iraq — romped with the sheep in a farm shed.
The 30-year-old Kurd was trapped by DNA evidence after his underpants and socks were found at the scene.
Shocked farmer Frank Davidson said: "The ewe was not very well and not very happy." He told cops he feared "something funny" was going on involving his sheep and Shetland ponies.
A man had been seen acting suspiciously under a full moon and was spotted several times previously lurking in the farmyard.
On one occasion he casually smoked a cigarette before driving off, Hull Crown Court heard.
The sheep and a ram had been isolated as part of treatment for foot rot, at Mr Davidson’s farm in Preston, East Yorks.
He said he had found pants and socks nearby on THREE occasions as well as bread crumbs — apparently used to entice the animals.
Amin was found guilty by a jury of having sex with an animal. Prosecutor Caroline Wigin said DNA swabs suggested a billion to one chance it was not him.
Amin, who fears deportation after three years in the UK, was sentenced to six months’ jail. But he could be out next week because of time already spent behind bars.
Judge Michael Mettyear told him: "The suspicion is that your offending was not limited to this one offence."

Veiled Muslim Barred from Bus

A Muslim woman was barred, by the driver, from boarding a bus because she refused to remove her veil. The woman was trying to board with a bus pass but refused to remove her veil to allow the driver to identify that she was the owner of the pass. At that point the driver told her she could not board.The woman involved did not want to be identified but told the local paper:
Bus drivers should be told how to deal with this situation. The veil is my choice and my religious duty. I am willing to go in and help the company so everyone knows what to do.
It is not the drivers who need to "know what to do" but this woman. If her religion prevents her from using a service then she cannot use that service. As a spokesman for the company said, "Under regulations passengers are required to confirm their identity if using a photo bus pass. If passengers aren't able to do this they will still be able to travel by paying for their trip."

'rent-a-mob'

TWO of Britain’s most notorious Muslim fanatics spouted hate yesterday as protesters clashed with cops outside a court.
Ranting preacher Anjem Choudary issued a chilling warning of further UK terror attacks after four people were arrested.
He and trouble-stirrer Omar Brooks — who hurled abuse at Home Secretary John Reid in September — had joined an angry mob of 100 at London’s Old Bailey.
They were protesting about the trial of Mizanur Rahman, 23, who was held during a hate demo against cartoons depicting Mohammed.
Choudary said: "We should not be surprised at people doing something like 7/7. How else do you expect Muslims to express themselves? We are a community under siege. It’s going to blow up in everyone’s faces one day."
Brooks, 34, also known as Abu Izzadeen, held a bullhorn while Choudary, 39, shouted to the crowd — many of whom had hidden their faces.
Rahman and three others are accused of inciting racial hatred.
Male demonstrators, most wearing scarves across their faces, held placards reading 'Cartoonist free at large, protesters criminalised', 'Freedom to insult Mohammed, no freedom to defend his honour', and 'Biased government, biased CPS, biased police, biased judges'. Female protesters, in a separate enclosure from the men and wearing full veils, held placards reading: "Shariah — the only option for the UK."
Speaking through a megaphone, Mr Choudary told supporters: "Islam is the fastest growing belief in the UK, the fastest growing belief in Europe and the fastest growing belief around the world."
Police injured in Muslim Old Bailey protest

Four Muslims arrested at Old Bailey protest

Man faces terror charges in court

A man who allegedly tried to board a London to Pakistan flight with two metal batons and a night-vision scope will appear in court later.
Sohail Anjum Qureshi, 29, is also accused of preparing to take £9,000 in cash to Pakistan's capital Islamabad on 18 October for terrorism purposes.
He also allegedly tried to take "combat manuals", including the Mujahideen Poison Handbook, on board at Heathrow.
Mr Qureshi will appear before the City of Westminster Magistrates' Court.
It is claimed he also had two sleeping bags and two rucksacks in his possession.
The combat manuals he is accused of having were on computer disks.
Mr Qureshi, of Forest Gate in east London, faces a total of three charges
'Instigation' claims
The first charge, under the Terrorism Act 2006, claimed that he was taking the articles "with the intention of committing acts of terrorism or assisting another to commit such acts".
The second, under the Terrorism Act 2000, said the articles were "for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism".
The third, also under the 2000 Act, related specifically to the combat manuals, claiming they would be "likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism".
Sources said the investigation related to alleged terrorist activities abroad and was not linked to any other current counter-terrorism operations.