Thursday, March 12, 2009

ANOTHER Muslim Child Molester Walks Free in Britain

The British judicial system is allowing yet another convicted muslim child molester to walk free.

"Gerald Bermingham prosecuting said the boy had gone to the restaurant with his father who was on a staff Christmas outing. The child broke the zip on his trousers on a visit to the toilets and, when he returned, he sat with another boy on a sofa. Islam then sat on the other side of the child and slipped his finger into the open zip, said Mr Bermingham. "

After bragging that traumatizing the little boy "only lasted a second or two" -- the pedophile's family & businesses were trotted out as an excuse to keep him out of jail - Even though the molestation took place in one of Mohammed's restaurants where the child was a customer!!:

"Rashad Mohammed defending stressed the incident only lasted a second or two and he said Islam was extremely embarrassed by his actions which were deeply regretted.
He said Islam, a married man with a baby daughter, who lives in Great Arthur Street, Smethwick was a successful businessman and he also owned restaurants in Hereford and Wolverhampton."LINK

The dhimmi judge swallowed the ludicrous excuses - hook - line & sinker!

"Islam admitted sexual assault and was given a nine month prison sentence suspended for a year and also made the subject of a 12 month supervision order."

Incredibly outrageous - but what do you expect in a Country where distraught mothers had to beg police to stop muslim pedophiles from preying on their young daughters.?

Clearly this is a judicial pattern:

In April, 2008 a young 17 yr. old girl was sitting, A young 17 year old girl was sitting, minding her own business, waiting for a bus. Another male was also at the bus stop. Muslim Shazad Rahman sat down next to the girl and proceed to sexually attack her.The terrified teenager tried to fend him off but he carried out a sexual attack while the cowardly witness turned a blind eye and refused to help. Rahman has multiple past offences - including prior sexual attacks, drunk driving, shoplifting, assault, etc and has spent time in jail. So what does the idiotic judge do? - While voicing outloud his opinion that Rahman should go to jail - the judge immediately changes his mind:

"Judge Anthony Hammond told him: "You deserve to go to prison for this offence. The only question is, `Do I suspend the sentence?' At the end of the day I have decided to suspend it."
He also handed Rahman a two-year supervision order. "

What caused the change? Why is a man, with a long history of criminal behavior, given such a lenient sentence for such a serious assault? " Well - Rahman had "consumed far too much alcohol" and had been involved in a fight with his ex-girlfriend's brother, the court was told. So being drunk and upset is an excuse for repeat sexual assault in the UK??!! Sounds like more pandering to muslims --- who by the way -- are not supposed to be around nevermind consume alcohol.

Just last June, a judge REWARDED a muslim illegal immigrant and convicted child molester - who sexually molested a young girl for three years - by ruling the pervert was NOT a threat to British society and thus was not deported and allowed to remain in the Britain. LINK

Another muslim pedophine gang - yes that's GANG - recently raked up over 100,000 pounds in FREE legal aid & interpreters (courtesy of the British taxpayers) to defend them and their perverted behaviours. The judge in this case predicted that they "could face deportation once they are released from prison, though Judge Joy said it would be difficult to find a country that would welcome them." LINK

Thus the British public can look forward to these five degenerates mooching off the taxpayers and roaming the streets of Britain putting more children at risk for decades to come.
These are just a few examples - there are MANY more.

The British government & judiciary have been dhimmified with a capital D. British judges have become muslim apologists as they continuously treat muslim perverts with kid gloves. In doing so, these judges repeatedly prove that they place little to no importance on protecting the British people - especially the children.

thanks to TheOPINIONATOR

No comments: